Dr. Peter BARANDT
Anwaltskanzlei (Frankfurt/Main und New York)
Rechtstipp
Herr
Dr. Dipl.-Kfm. Peter
Barandt, LL.M. (Dallas)
Fachanwalt für Steuerrecht
Rechtsanwalt
Vereidigter Buchprüfer
Attorney at Law (New York)
Vereidigter Übersetzer (Englisch-Deutsch)
Kanzlei
Anschrift
DIFFERENCES GERMAN VERSUS AMERICAN PROBATE AND ESTATE LAW
Rubrik: Strafrecht & Ordnungswidrigkeiten
Erstellungsdatum: 10.04.2007
Kurzbeschreibung:
Beitrag:
German Estate Law, German Inheritance Law and German Succession Law is all part of the continental-European Civil Law system and, therefore, makes a fundamental distinction between the Heirs (“Erben”), i.e. the successors of the Decedent (“Erblasser”), on one side and any other beneficiary to the Estate (“Nachlass”), including, but not limited to, Legatees (“Vermächtnisnehmer”), on the other side.
Whilst a German Heir (“Erbe”) under German Estate Law and German Succession Law directly steps into the shoes of a German Decedent at the moment of the German Decedent’s death without any interposition of a Fiduciary, Personal Representative, Executor of Estate, Administrator of Estate or the like, any other Beneficiary of a German Decedent’s Estate will have a claim and a cause of action only against the German Heir or against the German Joint Tenancy in Common of Heirs (“Gesamthandsgemeinschaft”, “Erbengemeinschaft”) consisting of the German Heirs and will not have such a claim against the Estate itself due to the non-existence of the Estate’s under German Law as a separate legal entity.
German Freedom of Testatorship (“Testierfreiheit”) will be limited by German Forced Heirship Rules (“Pflichtteilsrecht”) in Germany to a German Decedent’s surviving spouse and to his or her surviving children, i.e. to his or her descendants of the first degree, but not to their offspring/issue of any further degree, i.e. not to a German Decedent’s grand children nor to his or her great grand children nor to any other of his or her descendents of any more remote degree of kinship.
Neither per stirpes rules nor representation rules are applying to the German Forced Heirship Rule (“Pflichtteilsrecht”), instead, solely a surviving spouse and surviving children will qualify for taking under those rules.
A German Last Will and a German Testamentary Will (“Testament”) will not have to be witnessed or approved by two or three witnesses nor by any witnesses at all.
Instead, German Wills (“Testamente”) may either be established by means of being sworn before a German Notary Public (“Notar”) in the form of a German Notarial Will (“Notarielles Testament”) or they may be established in the form of a German Holographic Will (“Eigenhändiges Testament”).
The U.S. concept and legal notion of the contestability of a Testamentary Will for alleged exercise of undue influence on a Testator or a Testatrix is unknown to German Probate and Estate Law.
In particular, there is nothing like the American “Putnam scrutiny principle” preventing the making of testamentary bequests to persons standing in a confidential relationship with the Testator or the Testatrix, such as testamentary bequests made to the attorney drafting the will, the drafting attorney’s law partner, the drafting attorney’s spouse, physicians, nurses, clergymen, administrators of nursing homes or similar holders of personal confidence in German Probate and Estate Law.
All German substantive Estate Law, Inheritance Law and Succession Law in Germany and all German procedural Probate Law in Germany is Federal Law only and will be applied on a uniform and nationwide basis all over Germany.
There are no deviations of German Estate Law and German Probate Law on a State (“Bundesland”) by State (“Bundesland”) basis.
Unlike in the U.S., a German Estate (“Nachlass”) is not viewed by German Estate and Probate Law as a separate legal entity (“Juristische Person”).
Consequently, the offices of a Personal Representative of Estate, of an Executor of Estate and of an Administrator of Estate in the sense of U.S. Estate and Probate Law are virtually unknown to German Law, even though a German Executor may be named by a German Decedent in his or her Will (“Testament”), which in practice, however, is rarely done, because, as already outlined above, German Heirs (“Erben”) are deemed to directly step into a German Decedent’s shoes at the moment of his or her death as a German Joint Tenancy in Common of Heirs (“Gesamthandsgemeinschaft”, “Erbengemeinschaft”).
A Trust in the sense of U.S. Common Law is not known in German Estate Law either, i.e. there is no German Trust.
Jurisdiction over German Probate Proceedings will be held by the German Probate Court/German Surrogate’s Court (“Nachlassgericht”), which, in turn, is a department of the local German Municipal Courts (“Amtsgericht”) ranking still below the respective German County Court level/German District Court level.
Unlike in the U.S. and differing from U.S. Probate Law and U.S. Estate Law, in the event of a cross-border Estate, i.e. of an Estate involving assets in two or more countries, the governing for the international jurisdiction of a German Probate Court/German Surrogate’s Court over the personal assets, i.e. over the movable assets, of an international Estate under German Conflict of Law Rules will be established by the laws of the citizenship of the Decedent at the moment of his or her death and not by the laws of his or her last domicile.
In the event that a Decedent should have died holding two or more citizenships, such as the American citizenship and the German citizenship, any foreign citizenship such as a Decedent’s additional American citizenship will be disregarded by a German Probate Court and a German Surrogate’s Court (“Nachlassgericht”) for purposes of determining the laws applicable to the Estate.
As to real property, i.e. immovable assets/real estate, American Conflict of Law Rules and German Conflict of Law Rules fortunately do coincide and both refer to the location/situs (“Belegenheit”) of the respective land or other real property right.
Unlike in the U.S., there is no German Estate Tax in Germany, and, instead, German Death Taxes will be raised on a “per beneficiary basis” only in the form of a German Inheritance Tax (“Erbschaftsteuer”) raised per each individual Heir, and not in the form of a literal Estate Tax raised on the entirety of a German Estate.
In other words, German Federal German Inheritance Tax (“Erbschaftsteuer”) will be raised per each Heir/Beneficiary/Distributee/Legatee and will not be raised per Estate.
Consequently, allowances, exemptions, tax tables, and inheritance tax rates will apply per each Heir/Beneficiary/Distributee/Legatee only and not per Estate.
Thus, by means of this type of granting of multiple allowances the total German Inheritance Tax burden will somehow mitigated in comparison to a flat estate tax on an entire estate.
Amounts of allowances per each Heir/Beneficiary/Distributee/Legatee range and vary from EUROS 1,000 through EUROS 307,000 depending on the degree of kinship of each Heir/Beneficiary/Distributee’s/Legatee with Decedent.
Maximum tax rates and tax brackets of German Inheritance Tax range from 17 percent through 50 percent, once again depending on the degree of kinship of each Heir/Beneficiary/Distributee/Legatee with Decedent.
For the current EURO (€) versus U.S. Dollar ($) exchange rates please click here.
— Hier bitte Link schalten zu www.onda.com/convert/classic —
Moreover, such German Inheritance Tax (“Erbschaftsteuer”) will be raised on a Federal level only and not on the level of any of the sixteen German States (“Bundesländer”).
In other words, there is no German State Estate Tax raised in any of the sixteen German States (“Bundesländer”).
Unlike in the U.S., there is no option or election right for an Alternate Evaluation Date six months after the Decedent’s death as provided in U.S. Federal Law by Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) Section 2032.
So-called Tie-Breaker Rules provided by the American-German Estate and Inheritance Tax Treaty Dated December 3, 1980, i.e. by the “Convention Between the Federal Republic of Germany And the United States of America For the Avoidance of Double Taxation With Respect to Taxes on Estates, Inheritances and Gifts Dated December 3, 1980” (“Abkommen vom 3. Dezember 1980 zwischen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika zur Vermeidung der Doppelbesteuerung auf dem Gebiete der Nachlass-, Erbschaft- und Schenkungsteuern”), provide that the right to raise Estate Tax or Inheritance Tax on an American-German Estate on a worldwide basis will solely go to the country of Decedent’s last “residence” (“Wohnsitz”), in case of two or more “residences” (“Wohnsitze”) to his or her last “permanent home” (“ständige Wohnstätte”), in case of two or more “permanent homes” (“ständigen Wohnstätten”) to the country of his or her last “center of vital interests” (“Mittelpunkt der Lebensinteressen”), then to the country of his or her last “habitual abode” (“gewöhnlicher Aufenthalt”), then to the country of his or her last “citizenship” (“Staatsbürgerschaft”), and finally, and in the event that the individual at the moment of his or her death had been a citizen of both the U.S. and Germany or of neither of them, as a matter of last resort, the U.S. government and the German government will have to settle the question by means of mutual agreement (“Verständigungsverfahren”).
Whilst a German Heir (“Erbe”) under German Estate Law and German Succession Law directly steps into the shoes of a German Decedent at the moment of the German Decedent’s death without any interposition of a Fiduciary, Personal Representative, Executor of Estate, Administrator of Estate or the like, any other Beneficiary of a German Decedent’s Estate will have a claim and a cause of action only against the German Heir or against the German Joint Tenancy in Common of Heirs (“Gesamthandsgemeinschaft”, “Erbengemeinschaft”) consisting of the German Heirs and will not have such a claim against the Estate itself due to the non-existence of the Estate’s under German Law as a separate legal entity.
German Freedom of Testatorship (“Testierfreiheit”) will be limited by German Forced Heirship Rules (“Pflichtteilsrecht”) in Germany to a German Decedent’s surviving spouse and to his or her surviving children, i.e. to his or her descendants of the first degree, but not to their offspring/issue of any further degree, i.e. not to a German Decedent’s grand children nor to his or her great grand children nor to any other of his or her descendents of any more remote degree of kinship.
Neither per stirpes rules nor representation rules are applying to the German Forced Heirship Rule (“Pflichtteilsrecht”), instead, solely a surviving spouse and surviving children will qualify for taking under those rules.
A German Last Will and a German Testamentary Will (“Testament”) will not have to be witnessed or approved by two or three witnesses nor by any witnesses at all.
Instead, German Wills (“Testamente”) may either be established by means of being sworn before a German Notary Public (“Notar”) in the form of a German Notarial Will (“Notarielles Testament”) or they may be established in the form of a German Holographic Will (“Eigenhändiges Testament”).
The U.S. concept and legal notion of the contestability of a Testamentary Will for alleged exercise of undue influence on a Testator or a Testatrix is unknown to German Probate and Estate Law.
In particular, there is nothing like the American “Putnam scrutiny principle” preventing the making of testamentary bequests to persons standing in a confidential relationship with the Testator or the Testatrix, such as testamentary bequests made to the attorney drafting the will, the drafting attorney’s law partner, the drafting attorney’s spouse, physicians, nurses, clergymen, administrators of nursing homes or similar holders of personal confidence in German Probate and Estate Law.
All German substantive Estate Law, Inheritance Law and Succession Law in Germany and all German procedural Probate Law in Germany is Federal Law only and will be applied on a uniform and nationwide basis all over Germany.
There are no deviations of German Estate Law and German Probate Law on a State (“Bundesland”) by State (“Bundesland”) basis.
Unlike in the U.S., a German Estate (“Nachlass”) is not viewed by German Estate and Probate Law as a separate legal entity (“Juristische Person”).
Consequently, the offices of a Personal Representative of Estate, of an Executor of Estate and of an Administrator of Estate in the sense of U.S. Estate and Probate Law are virtually unknown to German Law, even though a German Executor may be named by a German Decedent in his or her Will (“Testament”), which in practice, however, is rarely done, because, as already outlined above, German Heirs (“Erben”) are deemed to directly step into a German Decedent’s shoes at the moment of his or her death as a German Joint Tenancy in Common of Heirs (“Gesamthandsgemeinschaft”, “Erbengemeinschaft”).
A Trust in the sense of U.S. Common Law is not known in German Estate Law either, i.e. there is no German Trust.
Jurisdiction over German Probate Proceedings will be held by the German Probate Court/German Surrogate’s Court (“Nachlassgericht”), which, in turn, is a department of the local German Municipal Courts (“Amtsgericht”) ranking still below the respective German County Court level/German District Court level.
Unlike in the U.S. and differing from U.S. Probate Law and U.S. Estate Law, in the event of a cross-border Estate, i.e. of an Estate involving assets in two or more countries, the governing for the international jurisdiction of a German Probate Court/German Surrogate’s Court over the personal assets, i.e. over the movable assets, of an international Estate under German Conflict of Law Rules will be established by the laws of the citizenship of the Decedent at the moment of his or her death and not by the laws of his or her last domicile.
In the event that a Decedent should have died holding two or more citizenships, such as the American citizenship and the German citizenship, any foreign citizenship such as a Decedent’s additional American citizenship will be disregarded by a German Probate Court and a German Surrogate’s Court (“Nachlassgericht”) for purposes of determining the laws applicable to the Estate.
As to real property, i.e. immovable assets/real estate, American Conflict of Law Rules and German Conflict of Law Rules fortunately do coincide and both refer to the location/situs (“Belegenheit”) of the respective land or other real property right.
Unlike in the U.S., there is no German Estate Tax in Germany, and, instead, German Death Taxes will be raised on a “per beneficiary basis” only in the form of a German Inheritance Tax (“Erbschaftsteuer”) raised per each individual Heir, and not in the form of a literal Estate Tax raised on the entirety of a German Estate.
In other words, German Federal German Inheritance Tax (“Erbschaftsteuer”) will be raised per each Heir/Beneficiary/Distributee/Legatee and will not be raised per Estate.
Consequently, allowances, exemptions, tax tables, and inheritance tax rates will apply per each Heir/Beneficiary/Distributee/Legatee only and not per Estate.
Thus, by means of this type of granting of multiple allowances the total German Inheritance Tax burden will somehow mitigated in comparison to a flat estate tax on an entire estate.
Amounts of allowances per each Heir/Beneficiary/Distributee/Legatee range and vary from EUROS 1,000 through EUROS 307,000 depending on the degree of kinship of each Heir/Beneficiary/Distributee’s/Legatee with Decedent.
Maximum tax rates and tax brackets of German Inheritance Tax range from 17 percent through 50 percent, once again depending on the degree of kinship of each Heir/Beneficiary/Distributee/Legatee with Decedent.
For the current EURO (€) versus U.S. Dollar ($) exchange rates please click here.
— Hier bitte Link schalten zu www.onda.com/convert/classic —
Moreover, such German Inheritance Tax (“Erbschaftsteuer”) will be raised on a Federal level only and not on the level of any of the sixteen German States (“Bundesländer”).
In other words, there is no German State Estate Tax raised in any of the sixteen German States (“Bundesländer”).
Unlike in the U.S., there is no option or election right for an Alternate Evaluation Date six months after the Decedent’s death as provided in U.S. Federal Law by Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) Section 2032.
So-called Tie-Breaker Rules provided by the American-German Estate and Inheritance Tax Treaty Dated December 3, 1980, i.e. by the “Convention Between the Federal Republic of Germany And the United States of America For the Avoidance of Double Taxation With Respect to Taxes on Estates, Inheritances and Gifts Dated December 3, 1980” (“Abkommen vom 3. Dezember 1980 zwischen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika zur Vermeidung der Doppelbesteuerung auf dem Gebiete der Nachlass-, Erbschaft- und Schenkungsteuern”), provide that the right to raise Estate Tax or Inheritance Tax on an American-German Estate on a worldwide basis will solely go to the country of Decedent’s last “residence” (“Wohnsitz”), in case of two or more “residences” (“Wohnsitze”) to his or her last “permanent home” (“ständige Wohnstätte”), in case of two or more “permanent homes” (“ständigen Wohnstätten”) to the country of his or her last “center of vital interests” (“Mittelpunkt der Lebensinteressen”), then to the country of his or her last “habitual abode” (“gewöhnlicher Aufenthalt”), then to the country of his or her last “citizenship” (“Staatsbürgerschaft”), and finally, and in the event that the individual at the moment of his or her death had been a citizen of both the U.S. and Germany or of neither of them, as a matter of last resort, the U.S. government and the German government will have to settle the question by means of mutual agreement (“Verständigungsverfahren”).
Disclaimer: Der Anwalt-Suchservice übernimmt keinerlei Gewähr für die Aktualität, Wahrheitsgehalt, Richtigkeit, Vollständigkeit oder Qualität der eingestellten Fachartikel. Allein verantwortlich für deren Inhalt ist die Autorin/der Autor.
Bitte beachten Sie, dass der Fachartikel den rechtlichen Stand der Dinge zum Zeitpunkt seiner Veröffentlichung darstellt. Dieser Fachartikel ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Eine Vervielfältigung oder Verwendung des Textes oder einer Grafik in anderen elektronischen oder gedruckten Publikationen ist ohne ausdrückliche Zustimmung des Autors nicht gestattet.
Top Beiträge in dieser Rubrik:
nach oben rollen

-
Aussetzung des § 63 StGB zur Bewährung bei freiwilliger Therapie
(2729 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 13.07.2010 Autor: Jens Jeromin)
-
DIFFERENCES GERMAN VERSUS AMERICAN PROBATE AND ESTATE LAW
(2722 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 10.04.2007 Autor: Peter Barandt)
-
Verkehrs-Strafverfahren: Aussage-Verwertungsverbot auch bei Spontanäußerungen der Ehefrau?
(2693 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 17.06.2008 Autor: Sven Skana)
-
Mutter-Kind-Adaption nach § 35 BtMG kann § 64 StGB verhindern.
(2582 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 13.07.2010 Autor: Jens Jeromin)
-
Aussageverweigerungsrecht - Die "Erste Hilfe" in Strafsachen
(2471 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 18.05.2010 Autor: Mark Pilz)
-
Meindeid und Falschaussage vor Gericht
(2323 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 03.12.2010 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
Einfuhr nicht geringer Menge BtM-Mindeststrafe trotz Vorbelastungen
(2319 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 13.07.2010 Autor: Jens Jeromin)
-
Kein Fahrverbot gegen Fahrzeughalter bei Verletzung von Halterpflichten!
(2319 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 29.01.2008 Autor: Sven Skana)
-
Strafrechtliche Haftung für Steuerberater insolvenzreifer Unternehmen?
(2317 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 25.02.2010 Autor: Holger Syldath)
-
Verteidigung bei sog. Fahrerflucht oder unerlaubtem Entfernen vom Unfallort
(2306 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 21.12.2010 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
§ 142 StGB: Unerlaubtes Entfernen vom Unfallort
(2269 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 13.03.2008 Autor: Yves W. Junker)
-
Kosten des Anwalts und Strafverteidigers im Strafverfahren
(2220 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 30.11.2010 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
BESONDERHEITEN DEUTSCH-AMERIKANISCHER ERBSCHAFTEN UND NACHLÄSSE
(2160 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 10.04.2007 Autor: Peter Barandt)
-
Nebenklage und Adhäsionsverfahren
(2126 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 05.01.2011 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
Schweigeverteidigung. Das richtige Vorgehen.
(2095 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 09.12.2010 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
Die richtige Verteidigung – Schweigeverteidigung!
(2083 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 02.10.2007 Autor: Tim Geißler)
-
Endlich mehr Rechte für U-Haft-Gefangene
(2073 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 26.04.2010 Autor: Stefan Tripmaker)
-
Verhalten im Strafverfahren und Ermittlungsverfahren
(2030 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 30.11.2010 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
Die Bestechlichkeit von Kassenärzten im geschäftlichen Verkehr
(1983 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 05.07.2008 Autor: Marc Harten)
-
Gesetz zur europaweiten Vollstreckung von Geldstrafen und Geldbußen in Kraft getreten
(1923 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 02.12.2010 Autor: Björn Blume)
-
Notwehr: Wenn das Opfer zum Täter wird
(1896 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 18.05.2010 Autor: Mark Pilz)
-
Zeuge vor Gericht
(1817 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 13.10.2007 Autor: Wolfgang Ferner)
-
Der Deal im Strafverfahren
(1770 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 30.04.2007 Autor: Frank H. Langen)
-
Das Geschäft mit der Wahrheit - Verständigung oder Deal im Strafprozess bzw. Strafverfahren
(1693 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 31.01.2011 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
Kein Fahrverbot / Absehen vom Fahrverbot bei langem Zeitablauf zwischen Vorfall und Urteil!
(1689 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 10.12.2007 Autor: Sven Skana)
-
Anforderungen an den Nachweis von angeblichem Kokainkonsum bei Strassenverkehrsteilnahme
(1644 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 12.02.2008 Autor: Sven Skana)
-
Das straßenverkehrsrechtliche OWi-Verfahren
(1635 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 28.02.2008 Autor: Yves W. Junker)
-
Das Zeugnisverweigerungsrecht und das Auskunftsverweigerungsrecht im Strafverfahren
(1630 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 18.03.2007 Autor: Marc Harten)
-
Der Deal im Strafprozeßrecht
(1620 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 25.03.2010 Autor: Steffen M. Kling)
-
Sinnvolles Schweigen, oder warum man nie voreilig zu Schuldvorwürfen aussagen sollte
(1585 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 11.05.2008 Autor: Marc Harten)
-
Neue Entwicklungen zum Führerscheintourismus / EU-Führerschein:
(1537 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 28.04.2008 Autor: Sven Skana)
-
Die erfolgreiche Strafrechtsrevision, oder: Revision kann nicht "jeder"
(1536 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 10.03.2011 Autor: Christian Mertens)
-
Benutzung eines Handys als Wärmeakku im Straßenverkehr: Grundsätzlich erlaubt!
(1524 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 06.12.2007 Autor: Sven Skana)
-
Alkoholfahrt: Hustenlöser im Mund kann Atemalkoholmessung (AAK-Wert) verfälschen / ungültig machen!
(1521 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 02.04.2008 Autor: Sven Skana)
-
GERMAN CRIMINAL TAX FRAUD LAW FROM AN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVE, INCLUDING CRIMINAL INVASION OF GERMAN INHERITANCE (ESTATE) TAX
(1517 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 10.04.2007 Autor: Peter Barandt)
-
Der Rechtsanwalt als Strafverteidiger
(1499 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 25.06.2008 Autor: Michael Gubitz)
-
Strafprozess und Wahrheit
(1429 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 14.01.2011 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
Hoffnung in Bußgeldverfahren – Videomessung unverwertbar?
(1402 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 27.09.2007 Autor: Tim Geißler)
-
Wenn die Strafverfolger kommen, …
(1395 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 29.07.2010 Autor: Christian Mertens)
-
Drogenkonsum: Fristsetzung bei Gutachtenanforderung MPU muss angemessen sein!
(1354 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 06.02.2008 Autor: Sven Skana)
-
Steuerhinterziehung und Selbstanzeige
(1319 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 25.03.2010 Autor: Steffen M. Kling)
-
Regeln für das Verhalten im Bußgeldverfahren
(1303 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 19.04.2011 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
Welche Rechte habe ich ?
(1250 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 01.02.2011 Autor: Giuseppe Olivo)
-
Drogenfahrt - Kein Fahrlässiges Führen eines Kfz? Keine Fahrlässigkeit bei langer Zeitspanne zwischen Konsum und Fahrtan
(1237 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 09.04.2009 Autor: Sven Skana)
-
Keine Fahrtenbuchauflage nach verdachtsunabhängiger Videoüberwachung
(1232 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 29.04.2011 Autor: Sven Skana)
-
Vorgehen und Verteidigung bei Fahren mit Rauschmitteln, Drogen und Medikamenten
(1168 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 30.03.2011 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
Die fahrlässige Tötung im Lichte der strafrechtlichen Verantwortlichkeit von Ärzten
(1148 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 04.05.2008 Autor: Marc Harten)
-
Aktuelles zum Ordnungswidrigkeitenrecht
(1125 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 26.10.2009 Autor: Marc Harten)
-
Halten der Freisprecheinrichtung eines Handys erlaubt!
(1084 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 23.01.2008 Autor: Sven Skana)
-
Notwehr: 77-jähriger Renter erschießt flüchtenden Räuber von hinten
(1083 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 30.07.2011 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
Trunkenheitsfahrt und Trunkenheit im Verkehr - § 316 StGB und § 24a StVG
(1002 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 14.07.2011 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
Das Plagiat
(984 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 01.03.2011 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
Pflichtverteidigung - Notwendige Verteidigung
(874 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 28.09.2011 Autor: Nina Wittrowski)
-
Das Aussageverweigerungsrecht im Jugendstrafrecht
(796 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 21.09.2011 Autor: Nina Wittrowski)
-
Widerstand gegen Vollstreckungsbeamte, Beleidigung und Körperverletzung
(669 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 25.09.2011 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
Möglichkeit zur vorzeitigen Abkürzung der Führerscheinsperrfrist nach Alkoholfahrt
(647 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 21.11.2011 Autor: Sven Skana)
-
Verjährung des Bußgeldbescheides
(641 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 24.11.2011 Autor: Jekaterina Achtermann-Ljubimow)
-
Veranstaltung oder Straftat – die Rechtslage bei Facebook-Party oder Flashmob.
(609 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 06.01.2012 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
Notwehr und Freispruch – "Hell's Angels" erschießt in Putativnotwehr Polizeibeamten
(596 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 11.11.2011 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
Der Wiederverkäufer von Betäubungsmitteln als Bandenmitglied – Bandenbegriff
(560 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 04.11.2011 Autor: Nina Wittrowski)
-
Rechtsprechung zum Tierschutz
(534 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 23.11.2011 Autor: Annette Brenken)
-
Verzicht auf Fahrverbot
(427 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 30.11.2011 Autor: Jekaterina Achtermann-Ljubimow)
-
Flensburg online
(395 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 29.09.2011 Autor: Katrin Zink)
-
Strafzumessung bei Steuerhinterziehung in Millionenhöhe
(327 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 08.02.2012 Autor: Nina Wittrowski)
-
Insolvenzstrafrecht- Voraussetzung eines Bankrotts i. S. d. § 283 Abs. 1 Nr. 7b und Abs. 6 StGB
(322 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 24.01.2012 Autor: Nina Wittrowski)
-
Alkohol und Radfahren
(292 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 05.02.2012 Autor: Norbert Lühring)
-
Betäubungsmittelstrafrecht – die „nicht geringe Menge“ (ngM)
(285 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 16.02.2012 Autor: Nina Wittrowski)
-
Qualifikation nach Vollendung eines Raubs möglich ?
(269 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 12.02.2012 Autor: Giuseppe Olivo)
-
Funkzellenauswertung
(251 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 11.02.2012 Autor: Giuseppe Olivo)
-
gewerbsmäßiger Betrug
(240 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 12.02.2012 Autor: Giuseppe Olivo)
-
Falsche Verdächtigung und Strafvereitelung - Übernahme von Fahrverboten und Punkten
(208 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 21.03.2012 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
Ermittlungsversagen im Mordfall Lena
(96 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 06.04.2012 Autor: Holger Hesterberg)
-
Forderungen aus vorsätzlich unerlaubter Handlung: Chancen durch einen Insolvenzplan
(29 mal gelesen)
(verfasst am: 16.05.2012 Autor: Hermann Kulzer)
nach unten rollen



